<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Choropleth Maps &#8211; A Guide to Data Classification	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/</link>
	<description>Geographic Information Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2023 12:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Roman		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/#comment-252169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=11852#comment-252169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good examples and explanations. Is there a way to create bins that have equal variances? I guess conceptually it would be a bit of a mashup of the quantile and standard deviation methods. Would this method be useful for certain applications?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good examples and explanations. Is there a way to create bins that have equal variances? I guess conceptually it would be a bit of a mashup of the quantile and standard deviation methods. Would this method be useful for certain applications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sirpa		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/#comment-26001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sirpa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 08:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=11852#comment-26001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A clear quide and easy to follow.
One important thing this guide leaves completely out is this: to which class the limit value belongs to?
If the classification is for example
    Class 1: 4 – 8
    Class 2: 8 – 12
    Class 3: 12 – 16
    Class 4: 16 – 20
    Class 5: 20 – 24
the label claims that value 8 for example belongs both to classes 1 and 2 and missleads the map reader.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A clear quide and easy to follow.<br />
One important thing this guide leaves completely out is this: to which class the limit value belongs to?<br />
If the classification is for example<br />
    Class 1: 4 – 8<br />
    Class 2: 8 – 12<br />
    Class 3: 12 – 16<br />
    Class 4: 16 – 20<br />
    Class 5: 20 – 24<br />
the label claims that value 8 for example belongs both to classes 1 and 2 and missleads the map reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sanjita Dhingra		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/#comment-10315</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanjita Dhingra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 04:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=11852#comment-10315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very useful, but didn&#039;t understand the standard deviation part. How did you get stand deviation as 3.7? Please explain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful, but didn&#8217;t understand the standard deviation part. How did you get stand deviation as 3.7? Please explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jocelino Júnior		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/#comment-2546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jocelino Júnior]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=11852#comment-2546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article! Very clear and useful explanations on how to use data classification methods when making choropleths maps and other data-based works. Thank you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! Very clear and useful explanations on how to use data classification methods when making choropleths maps and other data-based works. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jusTodd		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/#comment-2054</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jusTodd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=11852#comment-2054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting, but the piece fails to discuss a very important point in classification schemes.  From a user perspective, it is always important to remember to classify in a clearly understood format.  Use of meaningless percentages have relatively little impact.  13%, 68%, 91% make no statement to the common reader. Conversely,  25%, 50%, 75% are immediately recognized by most individuals and stand out and make a statement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but the piece fails to discuss a very important point in classification schemes.  From a user perspective, it is always important to remember to classify in a clearly understood format.  Use of meaningless percentages have relatively little impact.  13%, 68%, 91% make no statement to the common reader. Conversely,  25%, 50%, 75% are immediately recognized by most individuals and stand out and make a statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/choropleth-maps-data-classification/#comment-2027</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2017 06:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=11852#comment-2027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On  choropleth key, please put the highest values at the top not the bottom. Also, next to each class value put the number of items in each class (n=) so the reader can see the distribution of the data.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On  choropleth key, please put the highest values at the top not the bottom. Also, next to each class value put the number of items in each class (n=) so the reader can see the distribution of the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
