<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Equal Area Projection Maps in Cartography	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gisgeography.com/equal-area-projection-maps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gisgeography.com/equal-area-projection-maps/</link>
	<description>Geographic Information Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 10:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/equal-area-projection-maps/#comment-95870</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2020 00:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gisgeography.com/?p=19237#comment-95870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi GIS Geography,

I am facing difficulty in remotely selecting a few equal-area projections to choose for my study area. Could you recommend an equal-area cylindrical projection that covers the extent of Southeast Asia (92.1892776489258949,-11.0097208023069015 : 141.0117645263674149,28.5432605743409908). 

Thank you, your help is greatly honored. Hope I will hear from you soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi GIS Geography,</p>
<p>I am facing difficulty in remotely selecting a few equal-area projections to choose for my study area. Could you recommend an equal-area cylindrical projection that covers the extent of Southeast Asia (92.1892776489258949,-11.0097208023069015 : 141.0117645263674149,28.5432605743409908). </p>
<p>Thank you, your help is greatly honored. Hope I will hear from you soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GISGeography		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/equal-area-projection-maps/#comment-71991</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GISGeography]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gisgeography.com/?p=19237#comment-71991</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/equal-area-projection-maps/#comment-71839&quot;&gt;Darren Rea&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, fixed it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/equal-area-projection-maps/#comment-71839">Darren Rea</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, fixed it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Darren Rea		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/equal-area-projection-maps/#comment-71839</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Rea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gisgeography.com/?p=19237#comment-71839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From the illustrations (pictures) it seems that the Eckert-2 projection is not an Equal Area Projection. As Antarctica is vastly larger in proportion to it&#039;s actual size.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the illustrations (pictures) it seems that the Eckert-2 projection is not an Equal Area Projection. As Antarctica is vastly larger in proportion to it&#8217;s actual size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
