<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How To Justify GIS Technology in Business	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gisgeography.com/gis-business-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gisgeography.com/gis-business-case/</link>
	<description>Geographic Information Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 10:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bala Kammela		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/gis-business-case/#comment-2861</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bala Kammela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 04:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=8082#comment-2861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GIS is best way of consuming real-world than the IT (RDBMS/BI).  It should interface with Postal Internet for logistics. Postal Internet (Internet of Remote Sensing and Remote Action) is a Utopian concept of connecting different addressable habitats (zones) of the Universe for pickup and delivery of remote sensing information.   

The remote actions will be summarized activity in W3C RDF format generated by the IT thought process. The remote action is also a GIS data like remote sensing. Both remote sensing and remote action should use W3C RDF vocabulary when GIS interfaces with Postal Internet. The reference scale should be of metric units or relative units but not the indexed data like coordinates(spherical lat/long).

  A Habitat is a zone like a farm or school or some “plant tissue” that has a real world reference. I also like GIS to be taught as course in early part of any degree course so that students can see their subject from GIS lens too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GIS is best way of consuming real-world than the IT (RDBMS/BI).  It should interface with Postal Internet for logistics. Postal Internet (Internet of Remote Sensing and Remote Action) is a Utopian concept of connecting different addressable habitats (zones) of the Universe for pickup and delivery of remote sensing information.   </p>
<p>The remote actions will be summarized activity in W3C RDF format generated by the IT thought process. The remote action is also a GIS data like remote sensing. Both remote sensing and remote action should use W3C RDF vocabulary when GIS interfaces with Postal Internet. The reference scale should be of metric units or relative units but not the indexed data like coordinates(spherical lat/long).</p>
<p>  A Habitat is a zone like a farm or school or some “plant tissue” that has a real world reference. I also like GIS to be taught as course in early part of any degree course so that students can see their subject from GIS lens too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Byrne		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/gis-business-case/#comment-1483</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Byrne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=8082#comment-1483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article, clinical and to the point, although I do think that your statement that &quot;open-source GIS software is where the future career growth of GIS can be found&quot; is surely blending in a subjective viewpoint? OK, I am part of the Esri family, and proud of it too, but I can see nothing but career growth for myself and my peers/colleagues within that family and extended network!

My view, and it is only my view, is that such statements do nothing but fuel the fire of open source vs. closed source, when there is in fact merit in both, and it would appear to me that there is increasing evidence for following a hybrid approach (much as Esri themelves are doing, and promoting - see http://www.esri.com/software/open and http://www.esri.com/software/open/open-source).

I guess I&#039;d be more inclined to say that future career growth lies where there is opportunity, rather than between alternative software licencing approaches.

But again, thanks for a really useful article, I will use it often!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, clinical and to the point, although I do think that your statement that &#8220;open-source GIS software is where the future career growth of GIS can be found&#8221; is surely blending in a subjective viewpoint? OK, I am part of the Esri family, and proud of it too, but I can see nothing but career growth for myself and my peers/colleagues within that family and extended network!</p>
<p>My view, and it is only my view, is that such statements do nothing but fuel the fire of open source vs. closed source, when there is in fact merit in both, and it would appear to me that there is increasing evidence for following a hybrid approach (much as Esri themelves are doing, and promoting &#8211; see <a href="http://www.esri.com/software/open" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.esri.com/software/open</a> and <a href="http://www.esri.com/software/open/open-source" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.esri.com/software/open/open-source</a>).</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;d be more inclined to say that future career growth lies where there is opportunity, rather than between alternative software licencing approaches.</p>
<p>But again, thanks for a really useful article, I will use it often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
