<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Magnetic North vs Geographic (True) North Pole	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/</link>
	<description>Geographic Information Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 05:23:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nancy Wilson		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-459472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 05:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-459472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-59751&quot;&gt;DLA&lt;/a&gt;.

The rise in Cancer is probably due to more complex and plentiful toxins in food and in the environment that are hard for the endocrine system and natural body detox systems to discharge.  But if the thin atmoshere and ozone layer are allowing more harsh sunlight radiation onto the Earth, you are probably right about that too.  Right now both poles are at record low sea ice levels (1/10/26) and there is much cloud coverover the Earth, so that might be masking the rays, while trapping heat in the amtosphere. When more ice is gone and greater drought arrives, there will be more cancerous and dangerous sun light and more advisories to stay out of sunlight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-59751">DLA</a>.</p>
<p>The rise in Cancer is probably due to more complex and plentiful toxins in food and in the environment that are hard for the endocrine system and natural body detox systems to discharge.  But if the thin atmoshere and ozone layer are allowing more harsh sunlight radiation onto the Earth, you are probably right about that too.  Right now both poles are at record low sea ice levels (1/10/26) and there is much cloud coverover the Earth, so that might be masking the rays, while trapping heat in the amtosphere. When more ice is gone and greater drought arrives, there will be more cancerous and dangerous sun light and more advisories to stay out of sunlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MATT88		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-358325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MATT88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-358325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-297739&quot;&gt;primero campanero&lt;/a&gt;.

sometimes when I read stupidity like what you wrote I wish satellites weren&#039;t real, so that the digital word salad idiots like you spew out couldn&#039;t reach my eyes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-297739">primero campanero</a>.</p>
<p>sometimes when I read stupidity like what you wrote I wish satellites weren&#8217;t real, so that the digital word salad idiots like you spew out couldn&#8217;t reach my eyes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dustin		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-343763</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 13:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-343763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-319205&quot;&gt;Icannot Believeit&lt;/a&gt;.

Only if you have put monkeys in ya ARSE!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-319205">Icannot Believeit</a>.</p>
<p>Only if you have put monkeys in ya ARSE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BigDNerJons		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-343762</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BigDNerJons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 13:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-343762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-297739&quot;&gt;primero campanero&lt;/a&gt;.

Well said! They tell us satellites are real, but can’t monitor aircraft over oceans…. Wtf!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-297739">primero campanero</a>.</p>
<p>Well said! They tell us satellites are real, but can’t monitor aircraft over oceans…. Wtf!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Curt Welch		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-341534</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curt Welch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-341534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-297739&quot;&gt;primero campanero&lt;/a&gt;.

How can someone be this dumb but still know how to type a message on the internet?  I don&#039;t get this. Can anyone explain this to me?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-297739">primero campanero</a>.</p>
<p>How can someone be this dumb but still know how to type a message on the internet?  I don&#8217;t get this. Can anyone explain this to me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ZEEbo		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-336860</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZEEbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-336860</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-297739&quot;&gt;primero campanero&lt;/a&gt;.

This must be the Dumbest response ever posted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-297739">primero campanero</a>.</p>
<p>This must be the Dumbest response ever posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-335930</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-335930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-42947&quot;&gt;JT Allyn&lt;/a&gt;.

Not correct. It has decreased by 30% in 3000 years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-42947">JT Allyn</a>.</p>
<p>Not correct. It has decreased by 30% in 3000 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-335929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-335929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-57240&quot;&gt;Cameron Cook&lt;/a&gt;.

The earth is doing no such thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-57240">Cameron Cook</a>.</p>
<p>The earth is doing no such thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-335927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-335927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-304325&quot;&gt;Bielec&lt;/a&gt;.

Everyone understands that &quot;North Pole&quot; without qualification refers to the geographic North Pole.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-304325">Bielec</a>.</p>
<p>Everyone understands that &#8220;North Pole&#8221; without qualification refers to the geographic North Pole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark M		</title>
		<link>https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-335767</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 23:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-335767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-303544&quot;&gt;Bud&lt;/a&gt;.

Bud—Regarding you first paragraph, if the 16 degree shift that you mention would be towards Kansas (your location,) then you should not experience any change in the difference between geographic north and magnetic north.  However, if the 16 degree shift would be towards, let’s say, China, then you would have a larger difference between geo north and mag north than before.

Regarding your second paragraph, how many shots did you drink before writing it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-303544">Bud</a>.</p>
<p>Bud—Regarding you first paragraph, if the 16 degree shift that you mention would be towards Kansas (your location,) then you should not experience any change in the difference between geographic north and magnetic north.  However, if the 16 degree shift would be towards, let’s say, China, then you would have a larger difference between geo north and mag north than before.</p>
<p>Regarding your second paragraph, how many shots did you drink before writing it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
