Comments on: Sentinel Satellites of the Copernicus Programme https://gisgeography.com/sentinel-satellites-copernicus-programme/ Geographic Information Systems Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:15:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Dinos https://gisgeography.com/sentinel-satellites-copernicus-programme/#comment-27394 Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:40:44 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=18394#comment-27394 It depends on the application. If your minimum mapping unit is not that small in size (larger scale), yes you can. For forestry applications (burned area mapping) or even basic land cover mapping I have seen using landsat 7 and Spot 5 images.

]]> By: GISGeography https://gisgeography.com/sentinel-satellites-copernicus-programme/#comment-25525 Mon, 03 Dec 2018 03:05:11 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=18394#comment-25525 In reply to Joseph Paquit.

Hmmm… generally eCognition is better for high resolution data sets. It may have some value for using with Sentinel-2, but you’re soon hitting that threshold where pixel-based classification would be just as effective

]]> By: Joseph Paquit https://gisgeography.com/sentinel-satellites-copernicus-programme/#comment-25487 Sun, 02 Dec 2018 02:39:48 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=18394#comment-25487 I have a question. Is it effective to use object based image classification for sentinel satellite imagery?

Thanks.

]]>